Mary the Mother of God, obstacle to ecumenism

Those who have studied the history of the Second Vatican Council will doubtless be familiar with the abrupt and unforeseen rejection of the Council's meticulously prepared schemata.  The European episcopal conferences, primarily those of Germany, France, and the Low countries refused the 72 documents prepared three years in advance and demanded the right to determine the orientation of the Council, to which astonishingly, Pope John agreed. What few may know is that the hasty effort marshaled by Pope John XXIII in the early months of 1963 to get new drafts approved and sent out to the Council Fathers included a schema on the Blessed Virgin Mary.

About this draft, Fr. Ralph Wiltgen, S.V.D. writes,

The proposal officially submitted by the Fulda Conference to the General Secretariat of the Council also quoted from Protestant writings. Bishop Dibelius, of the German Evangelical Church, was quoted as saying in 1962 that the Catholic Church’s teaching on Mary was one of the major impediments to union. Other German Protestant authorities, such as Hampe and Kunneth, were quoted as saying that the Council Fathers in Rome should remember that they would be erecting a new wall of division by approving a schema on Mary.
According to Father [Karl] Rahner [S.J.], whose written comments were distributed to all participants in the conference, the schema as then drafted was “a source of the greatest concern” for himself and for Fathers Grillmeier, Semmelroth, and Ratzinger, who had also examined it from a theological point of view. Were the text to be accepted as it stood, he contended, “unimaginable harm would result from an ecumenical point of view, in relation to both Orientals and Protestants.” It could not be too strongly stressed, he said, “that all the success achieved in the field of ecumenism through the Council and in connection with the Council will be rendered worthless by the by the retention of the schema as it stands.”
- Fr. Ralph Wiltgen, S.V.D., The Inside Story of Vatican II (formerly titled the Rhine Flows into the Tiber), © 2014 Tan Books

Fr. Karl Rahner, S.J., and his protege Fr. Josef Ratzinger
at the Second Vatican Council as theological advisors.

It is not this author's intent to inflame emotion against the architects of the Second Vatican Council.  However, fifty years later as seen in the light of the prophecy of Our Lady of Fatima, this effort to set her aside in the interest of man-made agreements with theological dissidents appears eminently blameworthy.
The Fatima prophecy warned that unless the Pope and all the Bishops of the world in a united act of public religion consecrated Russia to her Immaculate Heart, that country would flood the world with errors and war. 

Not only did the two Popes conducting the Council avoid the best opportunity since the prophecy was given to obey our Lady of Fatima, not a word against communism was included in the Council's sixteen constitutions, decrees, and declarations. 

It is important to understand the reasons and motivations for downplaying the Mother Of God at Vatican II. Ecumenism was one of its primary goals, as well as a new orientation towards serving the world as laid out by John XXIII in his last encyclical Pacem in terris.

The new orientation was summarized by Fr. Marie Dominique Chenu as follows:

"The text to be put forward in the council was approved by John XXIII, and by Cardinals Liénart, Garrone, Frings, Dopfner, Alfrink, Montini and Léger. It emphasized the following points: that the modern world desires the Gospel, that all civilizations contain a hidden urge towards Christ, that the human race constitutes a single fraternal whole beyond the bounds of frontiers, governments and religions, and that the Church struggles for peace, development and human dignity. The text, which was entrusted to Cardinal Lienart, was subsequently altered in some parts, without relieving it of its original anthropocentric and worldly character, but the alterations were not liked by those who had promoted the document in the first place. It was passed by two thousand five hundred Fathers on 20 October." (Iota Unum, Romano Amerio, ch. 42)

The listing of errors and assumptions listed above are too numerous to address in this brief summary. Let it suffice to say that if the 'modern world' desired the Gospel, something went terribly wrong in the decades following the council. Not only did the world (as it has always done) continue to reject the Gospel, but the Catholic Church herself entered a period of steep decline which continues unabated to this very day.

If explaining the Catholic doctrine of the Blessed Virgin Mary in a separate document seemed risky to many of the theological advisors at Vatican II who considered ecumenism to be prioritized above the Message of Fatima, then surely enough time has elapsed to recognize the results of their chosen course. There is still no union with the Oriental Churches; no agreement with the multitude of Protestant denominations and sects, and certainly no peace on earth.

To be fair to the Council Fathers, a short section of Lumen gentium, styled the Constitution on the Church does address the Blessed Virgin Mary in a salutary way, with this caveat:

"...those decrees, which have been given in the early days regarding the cult of images of Christ, the Blessed Virgin and the saints, be religiously observed.(22*) But it exhorts theologians and preachers of the divine word to abstain zealously both from all gross exaggerations as well as from petty narrow-mindedness in considering the singular dignity of the Mother of God.(23*) Following the study of Sacred Scripture, the Holy Fathers, the doctors and liturgy of the Church, and under the guidance of the Church's magisterium, let them rightly illustrate the duties and privileges of the Blessed Virgin which always look to Christ, the source of all truth, sanctity and piety. Let them assiduously keep away from whatever, either by word or deed, could lead separated brethren or any other into error regarding the true doctrine of the Church." (LG, ch. VIII)

One need not stretch their imagination too far to ponder whether the Fatima apparition was itself an occasion of scandal not only to Protestants, but to certain churchmen whose decisions are now chronicled for the world to see and judge.